The rich don't just get richer

No Snacks, no sweets, no seconds. Except on Days that start with S. Too simple for you? Simple is why it works. Look here for questions, introductions, support, success stories.

Moderators: Soprano, automatedeating

Post Reply
oolala53
Posts: 10104
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:46 am
Location: San Diego, CA USA

The rich don't just get richer

Post by oolala53 » Mon Jun 04, 2012 10:06 pm

The researchers found an association between BMI and wealth in every country. Globally, a 25% rise in wealth index was associated with a 54% spurt in BMI and a 33% increase in overweight. (This from an article that said that contrary to popular belief that Indian women are fat, their average BMI is well below even that of the lowest European countries: 21 compared to around 24 in Italy and France. Of course, this means the not-rich women are even thinner, though I can tell you from traveling there for 5 months in the late '70's, they aren't doing it for appearance's sake. I'm pretty sure the poor would choose to be heavier if they could.)
Count plates, not calories. 11 years "during"
Age 71
BMI Jan/10-30.8
1/12-26.8 3/13-24.9 +/- 8-lb. 3 yrs
9/17 22.8 (flux) 3/18 22.2
2 yrs flux 6/20 22
12/20/24 24.1

There is no S better than (mod) Vanilla No S

User avatar
Over43
Posts: 1850
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:15 pm
Location: The Mountains

Post by Over43 » Tue Jun 05, 2012 4:58 am

That's interesting because here in the States we're told that poorer people are more obese and the rich are healthier and slimmer. (Men's Health I think?)
Bacon is the gateway meat. - Anthony Bourdain
You pale in comparison to Fox Mulder. - The Smoking Man

I made myself be hungry, then I would get hungrier. - Frank Zane Mr. Olympia '77, '78, '79

oolala53
Posts: 10104
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:46 am
Location: San Diego, CA USA

Post by oolala53 » Tue Jun 05, 2012 8:34 am

Yes, it is true here. Processed food is very cheap. I think anywhere food is easily available and cheap, access to it loses its prestige. Wherever most people are poor and really can't afford extra food, plumpness means wealth, so in poor countries, as soon as people start earning more money, they aspire to be get fat like the wealthy in their environment.

In the States, the prestige is in the quality of the food one can afford, and, if just any low lifer can eat enough to get fat, the prestige will be in showing restraint. We're talking about the real wealthy here, not just those in middle class comfort.
Count plates, not calories. 11 years "during"
Age 71
BMI Jan/10-30.8
1/12-26.8 3/13-24.9 +/- 8-lb. 3 yrs
9/17 22.8 (flux) 3/18 22.2
2 yrs flux 6/20 22
12/20/24 24.1

There is no S better than (mod) Vanilla No S

wosnes
Posts: 4168
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 3:38 pm
Location: Indianapolis, IN, USA

Post by wosnes » Tue Jun 05, 2012 10:48 am

In most parts of the world, food is very expensive. As you gain more wealth, you can buy more food, especially meat. I've just finished a book (which I will recommend here) that says contrary to what Gary Taubes has written, people who eat more meat are heavier than those who eat less meat.
"That which we persist in doing becomes easier for us to do. Not that the nature of the thing itself has changed but our power to do it is increased." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson

"You are what you eat -- so don't be Fast, Easy, Cheap or Fake."

User avatar
reinhard
Site Admin
Posts: 5964
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 7:38 pm
Location: Cambridge, MA
Contact:

Post by reinhard » Tue Jun 05, 2012 7:45 pm

It seems to work like this:

For the most part,

if you're really poor, you're starvation skinny.

if you're kinda rich (rich by global standards, poor by 1st world standards) you're fat.

if you're really rich, you're skinny.

Reinhard

Post Reply